Working systematically

  • Ratio Sudoku 2
    problem

    Ratio Sudoku 2

    Age
    11 to 16
    Challenge level
    1 out of 3

    A Sudoku with clues as ratios.

  • Ratio Sudoku 3
    problem

    Ratio Sudoku 3

    Age
    11 to 16
    Challenge level
    1 out of 3

    A Sudoku with clues as ratios or fractions.

  • Alphabetti Sudoku
    problem

    Alphabetti Sudoku

    Age
    11 to 16
    Challenge level
    1 out of 3

    This Sudoku requires you to do some working backwards before working forwards.

  • Twin Corresponding Sudokus II
    problem

    Twin Corresponding Sudokus II

    Age
    11 to 16
    Challenge level
    1 out of 3

    Two sudokus in one. Challenge yourself to make the necessary connections.

  • Quadruple Clue Sudoku
    problem

    Quadruple Clue Sudoku

    Age
    11 to 16
    Challenge level
    1 out of 3

    Four numbers on an intersection that need to be placed in the surrounding cells. That is all you need to know to solve this sudoku.

  • Another Quadruple Clue Sudoku
    problem

    Another Quadruple Clue Sudoku

    Age
    11 to 16
    Challenge level
    1 out of 3

    This is a variation of sudoku which contains a set of special clue-numbers. Each set of 4 small digits stands for the numbers in the four cells of the grid adjacent to this set.

  • Who's who?
    problem

    Who's Who?

    Age
    11 to 16
    Challenge level
    2 out of 3

    Can you solve the clues to find out who's who on the friendship graph?

  • LOGO Challenge - Triangles-Squares-Stars
    problem

    Logo Challenge - Triangles-Squares-Stars

    Age
    11 to 16
    Challenge level
    2 out of 3

    Can you recreate these designs? What are the basic units? What movement is required between each unit? Some elegant use of procedures will help - variables not essential.

  • LOGO Challenge - The logic of LOGO
    problem

    Logo Challenge - The Logic of Logo

    Age
    11 to 16
    Challenge level
    2 out of 3

    Just four procedures were used to produce a design. How was it done? Can you be systematic and elegant so that someone can follow your logic?